The 18 Immutable Laws of Corporate Reputation – A Book Summary – Book-Reviews
The 18 Immutable Laws of Corporate Reputation - A Book Summary
Everything an individual or company does or produces
contributes to its reputation. Reputation is an intangible
asset, but a very important one. In some ways it is even
better than having money in the bank, but not as easily
quantified.A good reputation is its own advertising and quality seal.
It can engender loyalty in customers that can cross several
generations and time zones. A good reputation can bring in
more customers in the good times, and be a protective buffer
in the bad times.The author has delineated what he calls the, "18 Immutable
Laws of Corporate Reputation." This book holistically
deals with the topic of reputation management in three
parts: establishing a good reputation, keeping that good
reputation and repairing a damaged reputation.Law One: Maximize Your Most Powerful AssetReputation is an intangible asset yet it is arguably the
most valuable asset to manage and maximize. A good
reputation can attract and keep customers, investors,
and employees. Because of this, a good reputation is like
a reservoir of good will (towards the company) to help
it weather bear markets, scandals, or natural crises.
Conversely, a lost or damaged name can scar a company
and provoke boycotts or drive off new capital.Law Two: Know Thyself ? Measure Your ReputationBefore you can manage your reputation you must first
measure it and keep score. Measuring reputation is
easily done through standard public opinion or market
studies; but as each corporation has different
stakeholders (target markets, shareholders, etc.) it is
necessary to customize. Less than half of corporations
have custom research programs. There are no clear
methodologies so it is important to identify the
stakeholders (from local to global) and the relevant
attributes or quantities to be measured: the same
company may rank differently in different surveys/studies.Law Three: Learn to Play to Many AudiencesNo company is an island. Everyone has opinion on
everything. You can never please everybody.
Stakeholders are everybody involved with the
corporation. The group is as diverse as: customers,
employees, investors, market analysts, shareholders,
government, special interest groups, local communities,
retirees, etc. Know who are important and play to them.
It is helpful to think of stakeholders in terms of a
hierarchy or, graphically, as a pyramid with the most
influential at the peak and others following in descending
order. However, it is important to keep in mind that
stakeholder influence is a dynamic relationship and the
same model or model is not necessarily applicable to other
markets/locales.Law Four: Live Your Values and EthicsStudies of America's largest companies show that a strong
reputation for moral and ethical conduct performed better
financially in terms of their returns on investment and
equity, and their sales and profit growth. One study
cites that on average the excess value beyond
shareholders' investments comes up to $10.6 billion more
than companies without a clear code of ethics and
supporting behavior.Law Five: Be a Model CitizenAt Timberland, social responsibility is an integral part
of the company's identity and is a significant component
of its reputation. Aside from activities like monitoring
their contractor's overseas facilities, improving energy
efficiency at facilities, and minimizing chemical wastes;
they encourage volunteering for community service by
considering it as paid leave.Law Six: Convey a Compelling Corporate VisionWhat is this corporation trying to do? That is the
question answered by the Corporate Vision and the guiding
principle of its leaders and personified by the CEO.
The vision and the leaders motivate the stakeholders,
who in turn have enormous impact on reputation.Law Seven: Create Emotional AppealEmotional appeal is difficult to quantify or define; but
it is what engenders passionate customer loyalty and
strengthens reputations. It is mostly shaped by the sum
of people's long-term interactions with the company's
employees, products, services, and even advertisements.Establishing emotional appeal is more than just satisfying
customers. It is also about getting the customer to
identify happiness or contentment with the product. In the
fast paced electronic world it is also helped by a
personal touch or special treatment.Law Eight: Recognize Your ShortcomingsExamine your reputation and assess if your current business
practices still build that reputation. Only by first
recognizing discrepancies and problems can you take steps
to fix them. The sooner you come clean, the sooner you can
fix them and do "damage control" before it reaches a
crisis situation.Law Nine: Stay VigilantDamages to reputation can happen suddenly and over time.
Managers must be vigilant and act quickly on either
instance because both can be equally damaging and have
long-term effects. Someone should always be watching?
and thinking. In the age of the Internet even local news
can be known globally in minutes. But not all news is
true news. A sudden or instinctive and unconsidered
response (like an inadvertent admission of guilt with
an apology) is just as potentially damaging as doing
nothing in the hope a situation will abate.Law Ten: Make Your Employees Your Reputation ChampionsEmployees are the first direct contact between a
corporation and its customers. Naturally, employee
behavior has a large impact on the company's reputation
both on and off the job, from how they service the
customer to how they talk about the corporation with
friends, relatives, etc.Law Eleven: Control the Internet Before It Controls YouThe World Wide Web is an extraordinary tool and can be a
boon or bane to your reputation. The World Wide Web has
no regulatory body to separate the truth from the lies.
It is estimated over 730 million people are able to
interact with each other ? by 2006 it could be over 1
billion.Surprisingly, a survey by Hill & Knowlton and Chief
Executive Magazine found 16% of companies monitor the
Internet closely, 39% check it periodically, and 43%
don't bother.Law Twelve: Speak with a Single VoiceCorporations allocate major funding towards building
their brand. As a corporation grows and diversifies its
products, there is a tendency to stray from the
corporate brand. The result of this is weakening of
the corporate brand and weakening of their reputation.
A startling example comes from IBM, which in 1993 had
more than 800 different logos!Law Thirteen: Beware the Dangers of Reputation Rub-offThere is a saying that goes, "Birds of the same feather
flock together." When two or more corporations enter
into a partnership or work together; their reputations
may be attributed to each other. Sometimes this is
desirable and is intentional. It is important to keep
in mind the intention doesn't necessarily translate
to the desired effect.Law Fourteen: Manage Crises with FinesseNo one and no corporation is immune from crises. Crises
can be in due to corporate transgressions, natural
calamities, malicious intent, a private remark taken
out of context, etc. The most critical period to
reputation damage control happens in the first few days.
It is the tendency of companies to go quiet. This is a
mistake because critics will quickly use the time to
give their worst-case scenario and put out a negative
spin. The corporation should quickly gather all the
facts then make a public statement. The first statements
must be swift and sure. A mistake at this time will
taint all other succeeding statements. Customers and/or
the public need to be assured the right and responsible
action is being taken.Law Fifteen: Fix It Right the First TimeThere are many ways a company can try to fix its
reputation. Some companies may try put on a fresh
image by reinventing themselves with a refocused
vision or business restructuring. Other companies
will try reworking an old formula. Others still will
be working against their successful, dated reputation
that actually holds them back from making a more
contemporary image. But it is not enough to want the
change. The leader is key. The leader has to be dynamic
and focused to guide the company along the new way and
against old habits or instincts.Law Sixteen: Never Underestimate the Public's CynicismPeople have become more wary of companies. Claims and
statements are normally met with skepticism. Debacles
like Enron have worsened the loss of confidence Better
communications is key to improving relationships. One
company's standard "no comment" response affirmed the
public's belief of their guilt. A better relationship
could mean winning concessions for the company's
interests with favorable legislature or more community
support.Law Seventeen: Remember ? Being Defensive Is OffensivePeople appreciate forthrightness and contrition. Being
defensive is more likely to offend them. The publicneeds to hear an apology and needs to know what is being
done to end the crisis. Often the best way to diffuse a
crisis is with a timely and sincere apology.Law Eighteen: If All Else Fails, Change Your NameSometimes the best way to get rid of a bad reputation is
to build a new one with a new name. But name changes
shouldn't be entered into lightly. The large expense aside,
a name change is confusing and causes loss of brand equity.
You could lose all the good, and you're not guaranteed to
be free of the bad. At the very least, a new name opens
the possibility of people willing to hear a new message.By: Regine P. Azurin and Yvette Pantilla
Regine Azurin is the President of BusinessSummaries.com, a
company that provides business book summaries of the latest
bestsellers for busy executives and entrepreneurs.http://www.bizsum.com
"A Lot Of Great Books....Too Little Time To Read"
Free Book Summaries Of Latest Bestsellers for Busy
Executives and EntrepreneursMailto: mailto:freearticle@bizsum.com
BusinessSummaries is a BusinessSummaries.com service.(c) Copyright 2001- 2005, BusinessSummaries.com - Wisdom In A Nutshell
Can a Corporate Executive Really Use The Beautiful Mind; To guide decision making?
Can a Corporate Executive Really Use The Beautiful Mind; To guide decision making?
I would like to comment on the "A Beautiful Mind" movie and the book, which was actually much better. I just finished reading another book on the similar side of John Nashs' assertion of working together rather than competing against. That book was "Co-opetition." By Adam M. Brandenburger (Havard guy)and Barry J. Nalebuff (Yale Dude). Many have been aware of such theory for quite a while and practice such occasionally for the betterment of an industry or through the art of diplomacy, sometimes through misdirection and other times as an experiment (nothing more, nothing less) especially when it really does not matter and it is not really core to our direction and market domination strategy for any given region. I would have to differ from the movie version in that if you tried to run your business in the fashion that Jim Nash discussed in theory you might do well for a while, but would eventually get hammered in the market place, whether or not you actually were able to sleep with a brunette when you wanted the blond with the big bust (go see the movie, you will understand that comment). In theory it sounded wonderful in the movie yet would not take you very far in the cut throat world of business, even though the regulators always want to level the playing field, more often then not they are manipulated agents for the competition as indicated by Adam Smith, Carl Marx and Rodney Dangerfield in "Back to School." The fact is that even the referees of business, namely the regulating bodies who want to see the playing field leveled usually tip it in the favor of a politically powerful and well connected companies which fund the campaigns of the over see'ers (politicians). Once the regulatory bodies find they have been duped rather than bring it up with the politicians, they want to punish all the players in the industry and kick them out of the game, of course this hurts the fans (consumers) and then the game (industry) and then the referees and fans are not needed (read; "When Atlas Shrugged" By Ayn Rand).Unless a perfect and fair playing field exists John Nash's dream of a perfect system and economic structure cannot exist and that is pretty straight forward with the study of human psychology, Machiavelli, Maslow's hierarchy of needs, the prisoners, dilemma or a multitude of truisms surrounding human nature. The world does not work that way, it is not a perfect world and therefore such theories are not worthy of attempt although obviously interesting from an academia standpoint or discussion at the geological societies random coffee house dialogues.The win-lose scenario keeps forcing someone to lose, if we were to really see the true picture here we would find that what John Nash was saying is that you need to take into consideration giving someone else what they want so you can get what you want. I say Obviously John is right. Too bad regulators condemn the greatest contributors of mankind, while the competitors cheat, the playing field is not leveled and the true voter of the monetary unit of trade called a dollar cannot see thru the clutter and scatter of the advertising and behind the scenes truisms of a system which is not all it seems.When looking at the true methodology of John Nash's achievements it is fair to say that being able to put simple concepts into mathematical formulas will significantly help the future of computers capable of fuzzy logic calculate the answers to game theory, war efforts, strategic thinking and competition exposure in business. That will be one of the great achievements of his work, which will be in the future. However one who is at the helm of a business has other responsibilities such as the survival and profitability of the company and using John Nash's strict modeling in an imperfect world is dangerous to the ongoing vitality of a once going concern. Be careful to prematurely adopt perfect systems in an imperfect world."Lance Winslow" - If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/wttbbs